top of page

2. Data Quality and AI: Embracing a new Future

Welcome to another deep dive into the world of data science and artificial intelligence. Today, we will explore the critical facets of data quality and AI, inviting you to reflect on how these elements intertwine and shape the tech landscape. Let’s ponder the delicate balance between the sheer volume of data and the necessity for its integrity in the age of AI.


The Intricacies of Data Quality


In recent times, it has become evidently clear that artificial intelligence can only be as good as the data that feeds it. The quality of this data directly influences the output, which means poor data quality results in unreliable AI models. Maintaining data quality is paramount, especially in an era brimming with excitement and hype surrounding AI capabilities. The realization is setting in that data quality is more than just a technical concern; it's a fundamental block in the data-driven world.


"An AI can only be as good as the data quality of the data you feed it into can be."


Companies today are faced with a burgeoning amount of data daily. Most are trying to build a service-oriented architecture where each service generates its own dataset. The challenge is ensuring none of this data gets lost, as it might become invaluable for future AI applications. Envision an organization discarding what seems to be trivial data today, only to find it could have been instrumental for a groundbreaking AI product tomorrow. The greater the risk, the greater the responsibility.


Evolution of Data Quality Standards


Over the years, perceptions and standards of data quality have evolved. This evolution is frequently industry-specific. In sectors like finance, where data underpins monetary values, strict data quality standards have always been essential. Ten years ago, the loss of even 5% of data was unthinkable. Today, while some industries tolerate minor data losses, there is a renewed awareness that every byte potentially holds untapped value for AI applications.


"Nowadays, we have services and products where it's totally acceptable that you lose like 5% of your data because you have so much data."


The growing importance of data, coupled with the promise of future AI applications, prompts organizations to rethink their data preservation and quality strategies. It raises the critical question: How far are we willing to compromise on data quality while chasing innovations?


The Art of Data Processing



Data undergoes an incredible transformation from its rough, raw initial state to the refined form ready for insights and AI applications. This journey requires meticulous processing and validation at every stage. A robust data pipeline ensures the consistency and integrity of the data, maintaining its value from the source to its final application. Without such vigilance, the potential for erroneous outputs increases exponentially.


"Their data doesn't stand for me like a gold bar where data has already an enormous value."


The analogy of transforming gravel into a gold bar perfectly illustrates the refinement process data must undergo. Initially rough and unpolished, each step in the data pipeline adds value and precision, eventually producing high-quality datasets ready for insightful analysis. Structuring and validating data at source and throughout its journey minimizes the risk of propagating errors.


Who's Responsible for Data Quality?


Assigning responsibility for data quality is often complex and layered. Ideally, data quality sits with the data owner—those intimately familiar with the data's business context and purpose. However, in practice, it demands a collaborative effort. Bridging the gap between the business and technical sides is crucial in ensuring data correctness and reliability. It's about creating systems where business users can easily validate data within their domain of expertise.


"The responsibility for data quality sits with the data owner."


Business teams own the processes that generate data, and they are best positioned to evaluate its correctness. However, technical teams must facilitate this by providing accessible data models and user-friendly validation tools. This synergistic approach ensures data quality is maintained without overburdening any single team.


Future of Data and AI Integration


Looking forward, the future of data and AI seems intertwined, with data literacy spreading across all business departments. As more people become data-savvy, the demand for high-quality, reliable data will surge. This proliferation of data awareness and literacy doesn't simplify the role of data engineers but rather adds layers of responsibility and complexity.


"The future looks very data heavy and not heavy in a negative sense."


Every department's growing reliance on data underscores the necessity for robust data quality practices. Imagine a world where all business decisions are data-driven, emphasizing the importance of accuracy and integrity. As such, data engineering roles will not only remain crucial but will expand in scope, integrating deeper into every facet of business operations.


Navigating the AI Hype and Practical Innovation


As AI technology advances, it often outpaces our ability to manage it effectively, necessitating a period of introspection and improvement in data infrastructures. The rapid developments in AI sometimes overlook the essential groundwork of data quality, leading to potential pitfalls. There might be a need to slow down AI's pace to align technological capabilities with robust data quality infrastructures.


"I think it would be good to slow down for a bit, to really recognize the impact the products that are out there already have and also understand what they need."


Nevertheless, commercial pressures and the lure of immediate gains might propel AI innovation forward, sometimes at the expense of sound data practices. Balancing rapid AI advancements with steadfast data quality measures poses a significant challenge but is crucial for sustainable progress.


This blog was created from a conversation with data leader, Stephan Schmidt, originally for The Data For Good Podcast. We'd love to hear your opinions on the topic too. So, drop us a comment and let's get talking.

Comments


bottom of page